|
| Home > 4. Featured Articles > Evolution of Book of Mormon Geography |
Evolution of Book of Mormon Geography
Author: Compiled by Richard K. Miner
Date: 2000-12-07
|
EVOLUTION OF BOOK OF MORMON
GEOGRAPHY Compiled by Richard K.
Miner A CHARGE AND A
PROMISE Pres.
Ezra Taft Benson: Reed
Benson, at a Mexico temple in Mexico City while on a tour of Book of Mormon
lands at Mexico City, told the group that it was here in this temple that his
father, President Ezra Taft Benson, received the strong impression to have
people diligently study and spread the message of the Book of Mormon. In his first conference address as President of the
LDS Church on April 1986, he said, “Unless we read the Book of Mormon and give
heed to its teachings, the Lord has stated in Section 84 D&C that the whole
Church is under condemnation. "And this condemnation resteth upon the
children of Zion, even all. "(D&C 84:56) "And they shall remain
under this condemnation until they repent and remember the new covenant, even
the Book of Mormon and the former commandments with them, not only to say, but
to do according to that which I have written." (D&C 84:57) Now we not only need to say more about the Book of
Mormon, but we need to do more with it... The Prophet Joseph said that "The Book of
Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our
religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than
any other book." The Book of Mormon has not been, nor is it yet, the
center of our personal study, family teaching, preaching, and missionary work.
Of this we must repent... I bless you
with increased understanding of the Book of Mormon. I promise you that from
this moment forward, if we will daily sup from its pages and abide by its
precepts, God will pour out upon each child of Zion and the Church a blessing
hitherto unknown-and we will plead to the Lord that He will begin to lift the
condemnation-the scourge and judgment. Of this I bear solemn witness. “
(Benson, "A Sacred Responsibility) The following are extracts
from "The Geography of Book of Mormon Events: A Source Book" by John
L. Sorenson and from "Exploring the Book of Mormon" by Joseph L.
Allen JOSEPH SMITH RETRIEVES
PLATES FROM THE HILL CUMORAH: 1823: Joseph Smith was visited by the Angel Moroni
and was shown plates in a hill near his home in Palmyra, New York. Age 18 On metal sheets which had the appearance of gold
were engravings of an ancient language. The plates were concealed in a box made
of stones which were cemented together and buried by Moroni 1400 years ago 1827: He received the plates and, though three years
in his care, the actual actual translation time was approx. 60 days 1830 The translaated book was published. During
this time he made comments to his parents and family memmbers about the features and dress of Book of
Mormon people. "Exactly what Joseph Smith believed at
different times in his life concerning Book of Mormon geography in general is
indeterminable due to lack of published accounts, except for his belief that
John Lloyd Stephens' book, "Incidents of Travel in Central America"
confirmed for him that these lands were Book of Mormon lands. Other early church leaders thought otherwise due to
the following incidents. "CUMORAH" 1831. Oliver Cowdery related story of a man walking along
the road and was given a ride by Joseph.
When asked where he was going replied, "Cumorah", then
disappeared. Whether his reply was real or imagined by Oliver is not known to
us, but he called the hill "Cumorah" thereafter. The hill was previously known as "Bible
Hill" or" Mormon Hill". Whether by this or by the assumption that
"Cumorah" was where the last great battle between the Nephites and
the Lamanites took place, certainly, most members of the Church for 150 years
have considered the Hill Cumorah in New York to be the same hill where the last
battle took place. (See David Whitmer; "Millenial Star" 40 (1870)
p.722) "WAGON LOADS OF
RECORDS" A talk by Brigham Young after the Saints arrived in
SLC has been used as an argument on occasion to suggest that the Nephite Hill
Cumorah was in New York. The rationale for the statement is that the Latter-Day
Saint Hill Cumorah in New York opened up and a number of the brethren went
inside where they saw wagon loads of records ... with the sword of Laban first
sheathed then later unsheathed. The conclusion is that if the Latter-Day Saint
Hill Cumorah opened up, then the last battles must have been fought around that
hill. The statement of Brigham Young was printed in mainstream Latter-Day Saint
literature. However, a statement about the same experience, given by Heber C.
Kimball, has not been included in the literature. He said that the incident was
a "VISION" that the brethren had of the hill. Note following quotes: Brigham
Young Discourses, 19:38 "Oliver Cowdery went with the prophet
Joseph when he deposited these plates. Joseph did not translate all of the
plates; there was a portion of them sealed, which you can learn from the book
of Doctrine and Covenants. When Joseph got the plates, the angel instructed him
to carry them back to the hill Cumorah, which he did. Oliver says that when
Joseph and Oliver went there, the hill opened and they walked into a cave, in which
there was a large and spacious room. He says he did not think, at the time,
whether they had the light of the sun or artificial light; but that it was just
as light as day. They laid the plates
on a table; it was a large table that stood in the room. Under this table there
was a pile of plates as much as two feet high, and there were altogether in
this room more plates than probably many wagon loads; they were piled up in the
corners and along the walls. The first time they went there the sword of Laban
hung upon the wall; but when they went again it had been taken down and laid
upon the table across the gold plates; it was unsheathed, and on it was written
these words: "This sword will never be sheathed again until the kingdoms
of this world become the kingdom of our God and his Christ." I tell you
this as coming not only from Oliver Cowdery, but others who were familiar with
it, and who understood it just as well as we understand coming to this meeting
enjoying the day, and by and by we separate and go away, forgetting most of
what is said, but remembering some things." Heber
C. Kimball, Journal of Discourses, 4:104 Brother Mills mentioned in his song, that crossing
the Plains with hand-carts was one of the greatest events that ever transpired
in this Church. I will admit that it is an important even, successfully testing
another method for gathering Israel, but its importance is small in comparison
with the visitation of the angel of God to the Prophet Joseph, and with the
reception of the sacred records from the hand of Moroni a the hill Cumorah. How
does it compare with the vision that Joseph and others had, when they went into
a cave in the hill Cumorah, and saw more records than ten men could carry?
There were books piled upon tables, book upon book. Those records this people
will yet have, if they accept of the Book of Mormon and observe its precepts,
and keep the commandments." THE ZELPH STORY (See
Kenneth A. Godfrey, "The Zelph Stroy", FARMS paper GOF.89 1989) Seven original accounts plus Joseph Smith's preceded
the official account. Joseph's did not mention Zelph, Nephites or the hill
Cumorah. Heber C. Kimball alone says that Zelph was killed in "the last
destruction among the Lamanites" but the meaning of "last" in
unclear. In 1942, 8 years after the incident, Willard
Richards was assigned to write the story for church history. His account was
written in first person as if Joseph Smith was writing and contained references
to the Lamanite-Nephite battle around the Hill Cumorah. These references were
deleted in the official records of the church at that time presumably by Joseph
Smith. "Both his first and the deleted
account speak of a vision that opened up to the Prophet Joseph Smith wherein he
identified the bones from the grave to be that of a white Lamanite by the name
of Zelph. One account identified Zelph with fighting that occurred in the
Lamanite-Nephite battle at Cumorah, and the other account deleted any reference
to the Hill Cumorah or to the last Lamanite-Nephite battle. The edited portion was include in the 1904 edition
of the Documentary History of the Church. This account was replaced by the
unedited version in the 1934 and 1948 editions. In 1957, Preston Nibley,
assistant Church historian, authorized Fletcher Hammond to announce that the
1904 edition was correct. In 1948, after Joseph Fielding Smith had become
Church historian, explicit references to the Hill Cumorah and the
Nephites-Lamanite battle were reintroduced and that phrasing has continued to
the present, including the phrase, "during the last great struggle of the
Lamanites and Nephites" and all references relating to Cumorah. It is likely that the thinking of the early Church
leaders regarding Book of Mormon geography was subject to modification to
substantiate their views, indicating that they themselves did not see the issue
as settled. FREDERICK G. WILLIAMS--THE
LANDING PLACE IN CHILE In the margin of a manuscript of the 7th section of
the D&C a statement in his hand writing indicated that the people of Lehi
landed on the coast of Chile, 30 degrees south latitude. The origin of the
words remains uncertain and "the statement should bear no particular
weight in considering the geography of Book of Mormon events ... The fact that
Little and Richards in their book asserted that the statement originated with
Joseph and by revelation nevertheless impressed people who desired the
assurance that a revelatory solution to the question of geography would
provide." These events as they were written up provided the
foundation for the traditional theory of the Church that Lehi landed in Chile,
the land of Nephi was in southern South America, Zarahemla was in North South
America, the river Sidon was the Magdalena river in Columbia, the Narrow Neck
of land was the Isthmus of Darien (Panama), Central and North America were in
the land Northward and the last great Lamanite-Nephite war occurred in New York
state around the hill now known as Cumorah. JOHN LLOYD STEPHENS (AN
ALTERNATE MODEL OF GEOGRAPHY) 1941. John Lloyd Stephens traveled in Central
America and wrote about it with illustrations of ruins. "Incidents of
Travel in Central America, Chiapas, and Yucatan" Joseph Smith in Times and Seasons; "It would
not be a bad plan to compare Mr. Stephens' ruined cities with those in the Book
of Mormon. Light cleaves to light and facts are supported by facts. The truth
injures no one... John Taylor in Times and Seasons; Joseph Smith
Editor; ... Central America ... is situated north of the Isthmus of Darien...
The city of Zarahemla ... stood upon this land. ...The Nephites lived about the
narrow neck of land which now embraces Central America. Who could have dreamed
that twelve years could have developed such an incontrovertible testimony to
the Book of Mormon?" Orson Pratt 1849: "The Book of Mormon gives us
the names and locations of great numbers of cities in the very region where
Catherwood and Stephens afterwards discovered them." TRADITIONAL MODEL ACCEPTED
OVER MESOAMERICA MODEL Orson Pratt Orson Pratt in 1868 reverted back to the
geographical model of 1830. Either he forgot entirely about or ignored the
Nauvoo development and its implication for geography, or else somehow he
incorporated it into his 1868 model in a way not now apparent. His thinking of
that era relative to Book of Mormon Geography became a part of the general LDS
thinking for the next 100 years and is still adhered to by many saints. George Reynolds adhered to the same philosophy as
Pratt, but noted, however, that other men had somewhat different ideas. B.H.Roberts A contemporary of George Reynolds ... concluded that
the Nephites were confined to a relatively small area. "I conclude,
therefore, that this migration of Nephites at this time extended no further
northward than the southern parts of Mexico ... occupying the old seat of the
Jaredite empire and civilization, and the land of Moron which the Nephites
called "desolate."... George Q. Cannon as a member
of the First Presidency 1890. "There is a tendency, strongly manifested at
the present time among some of the brethren, to study the geography of the Book
of Mormon. The first presidency have often been asked to
prepare some suggestive maps illustrative of Nephite geography, but have never
consented to do so. Nor are we acquainted with any of the twelve Apostles who
would undertake such a task. The reason is, that without further information
they are not prepared even to suggest... Of coarse there can be no harm result from the study
of the geography of this continent at the time it was settled by the Nephites,
drawing all the information possible from the record which has been translated
for our benefit." President Joseph F. Smith: "The Lord had not yet revealed the landing
place of Lehi and his people and that if, as he was being requested, he were to
approve a particular map purporting to show the landing and afterwards it was
found to be in error, it would affect the faith of the people." Joseph Fielding Smith, in 1938 as the Church historian ... reasserted the
general posture of the General Hemispheric 1830s models. There was no question
in his mind that tradition in this matter was based on revelation and that the
New York hill Cumorah was where the final battles took place. In the reprint of "the Documentary
History" Joseph Fielding Smith made significant changes in key statements
regarding the geography of Book of Mormon events. He rewrote the Zelph story
reinstating all the excised statements and said, "this was the correct
reading." They have remained to the present. J. Reuben Clark In a landmark 1938 speech to Church educators
further limited options in thinking new thoughts. In it he called for
retrenchment against liberal social, economic and political ideas that had
crept into some seminary and institute classrooms. He insisted that all
instruction must be gospel related and doctrinally based. That emphasis has
continued in the schools to the present. THE TRANSITION TO CENTRAL
AMERICA AND THE "TWO CUMORAH THEORY Benjamin Cluff; president of BYU. Formed a
"Zarahemla Expedition." "Geographically we entered Central America and
Tehuantepec and, we think, entered the land of the Book of Mormon at the same
place." We "probably furnished some evidence to
corroborate the theory ... of some Book of Mormon Authorities ... that the
narrow neck of land ... is the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. 1947‑1974 1.
"Ancient America and the Book of
Mormon" Thomas Stuart Ferguson and Milton R. Hunter: ... laid out
lengthy excerpts from Ixtlilxochitl, one of the native writers who recorded
traditions in Mexico after the Spanish conquest, showing striking parallels to
the Book of Mormon text. 2. Wells Jakeman, 1946, "Book of
Mormon Archeology ... played a key role in providing a measure of legitimacy
for scholarly studies of the Nephite record at a time when many of the Church
did not welcome them. He assured hundreds of students with "assurance that
Mesoamerica was the scene of Book of Mormon events and that the traditions of
that area were strikingly confirmatory of the scripture. His students,
Sorenson, Lowe, Warren, Norman, Allen and others went their own ways in Book of
Mormon matters in varying degrees of distance from their mentor even while
acknowledging important intellectual debt to him. Those who studied
systematically with him ended up with no question but that the entire story
took place in Mesoamerica and related significantly to what can be learned from
the native Mesoamerican traditions. He insisted that the ultimate
"test" for correlating the Book of Mormon in space and time with one
particular set of Mesoamerican sites and localities would involve comprehensive
study of the ancient world, not just geography. Ultimately tradition,
archaeology, physical anthropology and linguistics had to combine. He was the
first student of the geography of Book of Mormon events to gain professional standing
as an "archaeologist" and to see that geography must connect with
cultural contexts through meticulous scholarship. By the sixties the increasing number of people
working with the geography question had settled on Mesoamerica as the only
plausible candidate area in the New World. The hill in New York could not be
the scene of the final battle because of statements in the text itself, and
only some place within the high civilization area call Mesoamerica could
qualify. By the seventies, Church authorities still held a
cautious position on geography. At BYU Jakeman always felt held down
under what he inferred to be a lid on explicit discussion. Once the Church had
taken over financing the New World Archaeological Foundation from Ferguson in
the fifties, its professional staff were specifically instructed not to discuss
geography 1975‑1990 Several books have come forth relative to Book of
Mormon geography and archaeology due to some factors: (a) Anti‑Mormon
writers were attacking the Book of Mormon on grounds which the LDS Church was
unprepared to defend against by reason of its past reluctance to all, let alone
encourage, discussions of geography and archaeology. Poorly informed opponents
were having a field day attacking 19th century models and notions still widespread among church members and missionaries and
which were represented as the definitive LDS position. Further, a growing LDS
tourist clientele anxious to visit "Book of Mormon land" helped raise
to consciousness the question of where those lands might be located
specifically. Some prominent Authors: Ferguson, Hunter, Lowe, Sorenson, Warren,
Vincent, Norman, K. Christensen, Palmer, Hauck, Allen, Clark, M. Smith T.
Tucker and Treat. What we see in our survey of all these geographic
models which stretch over more than a century and a half is that superficial
study has been the norm, while confusion has been rampant for at least the
latter half of the period by reason of the multiplicity of discordant maps. It
is true that for the last 75 years the old hemispheric model has tended to fall
into disfavor, Tehuantipec as the narrow neck has become the common view, and
the notion of sweeping geological changes at the time of the crucifixion of the
Savior is now less often mentioned. Yet all sorts of variants continue to crop
up or reappear. It would be interesting to know the reasons why the
Lord has kept the true geography of Book of Mormon lands from the knowledge of
the Saints and the world until now when Pres. Benson has issued a challenge to
"do more with it" then receive the "blessings hitherto
unknown". BOOK OF MORMON CRITERIA
(WHAT THE SCRIPTURES SAY) By Alan C. Miner 1. Distances: Thousands or hundreds of
miles by foot? No roads. 10 miles/day. Mountains. 2.
Terrain: Book of Mormon shows travel from Land Northward to Land Southward and
from Zarahemla to Nephi relative easy and takes days rather than years. Travel from New York to South America by foot‑almost
impossibility. 3. Population Centers: 2 years after
coming of Christ the land was covered with people and houses from sea East to
Sea West almost as the sands of the seashore. ( Limited or all of America) Only Central America evidences large population
centers. New York shows evidence of family dwelling places, not communities. 4. Weather: No mention of hot or cold.
Could all peoples of Nephi gather around the Hill Cumorah in New York for four
years without mention of winters? 5. Language: No evidence of a written
language in all of North or South America except Central America. "AND IT
CAME TO PASS" a phrase common to Mesoamerican language. 6. Archeology: All criteria of Book of
Mormon met in Central America: buildings, tools, clothing, customs,
Nephite-Mulekite-Jaradite cultures. Lands, boundaries, rivers, seas, many
waters, wildernesses, narrow places. 7. History : Local histories by
Ixtililxochitl, Sahagun, Landa, the Lords of Totonacapon provide hundreds of
striking dates, events, cultures and traditions which correlate with Book of
Mormon. 8.
Quetzalcoatl and Jesus Christ accounts correlate. MORMON'S TRAVELS (Limited to
Mesoamerica or all of America? By
Alan C. Miner 320: "Ammoron….did hide up the records….in a
hill….called Shim which was in the Land Northward near the Hill Cumorah, near
the narrow neck of land. Mormon, at age 10, instructed to "take the
plates of Nephi unto yourself ...
when ye are about twenty and four years of age. 321: Mormon "carried into the land southward,
even to the land of Zarahemla. The whole face of the land had become covered
with buildings, and the people were as numerous almost, as it were the sand of
the sea. 322: War begins "in the borders of Zarahemla,
by the waters of Sidon. 326: "the people of Nephi appointed me that I
should be their leader of their armies. 327: "My armies ... began to retreat towards
the north countries ... to land of Joshua, which was in the borders west by the
seashore." 327‑345: "where, behold I had gone
according to the word of Ammaron and taken the plates of Nephi, and did make a
full account... (? West coast to New York) 345‑349: "Nephites did begin to flee
before the Lamanites ... until they came even to the land of Jashon near the
land where Ammaron had deposited the records . (Another trip to New York?) "we were again driven ... northward to the land
called Shem." North of New York?) "I did speak unto my people ... that they would
stand boldly ... and fight for their wives and their children, and their
houses, and their homes." "we did contend with an army of 30,000 against an army of 50,000‑with
such, firmness that they did flee before us ... until we had again taken
possession of the lands of our inheritance. (Land Southward from New York?) 350: "We made a treaty." And the Lamanites
did give unto us the land northward, yea, even to the narrow passage which led
into the land southward. and we did give unto the Lamanites all the land
southward." "I did cause my people that they should gather
themselves together at the land Desolation, to a city which was in the borders,
by the narrow pass which led into the land southward-called the city of
Desolation. 361: "the Lamanites did come down to the city
of Desolation ... we did beat them...and did lay a great number of their dead
into the sea." 363: I Mormon, did utterly refuse from this time
forth to be a leader of their people because of their wickedness.. "The Nephites did go up with their armies to
battle against the Lamanites, out of the land Desolation." but...
"were driven back ... insomuch that the Lamanites did take possession of
the city Desolation. ...the remainder did flee to the city Teancum" which
"lay in the borders by the seashore ... near the city Desolation. 364: ... the Lamanites did come against the city
Teancum ... but ... were repulsed ... and the Nephites... "took possession
again of the city Desolation. 366: the Lamanites did take possession of the city
Desolation ... and Teancum, and did take many prisoners both women and
children, and did offer them up as sacrifices unto their idol gods." 367: "the Nephites, being angry ... did go
against the Lamanites ... insomuch that they did ... drive them out of their
lands. ( back to the South America?) 375: ... the Lamanites did come down against the
Nephites with all their powers-and they fled ... and came to the city Boaz ...
and did again flee from before them, taking all the inhabitants with them, both
in towns and villages. And now I, Mormon , seeing that the Lamanites were about
to overthrow the land, therefore I did go to the Hill Shim, and did take up all
the records which Ammaron had hid up unto the Lord. ( A short trip or to New
York?) 379: We had fled to the city Jordan and other cities
... which strongholds did cut them off that they could not get into the country
... to destroy the inhabitants of the land." 380:... we did again take flight... (beyond Cumorah
and Shim?) And I Mormon, wrote an epistle unto the king of the
Lamanites, and desired of him that he would grant unto us that we might gather
together our people unto the land of Cumorah, by a hill which was called
Cumorah, and there we could give them battle. ...the king did grant me that
which I desired. And we did march forth to the land of Cumorah, and
did pitch our tents around about the hill Cumorah; and it was a land of many
waters, rivers, and fountains; and here we had hope to gain advantage over the
Lamanites. (4 years of New York winter. logistics away from home 4,000 miles.
Did the Lamanite army go back to the Land Southward? I, Mormon, began to be old; and knowing it to be the
last struggle of my people, and having been commanded of the Lord that I should
not suffer the records which had been handed down by our fathers, which were
sacred, to fall into the hands of the Lamanites. and hid up in the hill Cumorah
all the records which had been entrusted to me by the Lord, save it were these
few plates which I gave unto my son Moroni." 385: ... they came to battle against us ... my men
were hewn down ... ten thousand and
all my people save it were 24 of us, among whom
was my son Moroni. (140,000 in all) ... "save a few who had escaped into the south
countries, and a few who had dissented over unto the Lamanites. 400: Moroni writing. "the Nephites who had escaped into the country
southward were hunted by the Lamanites, until they were all destroyed. ‑therefore
I will write and hide up the records in the earth; and whither I go it
mattereth not." 420: "I supposed not to have written more, but
I have not as yet perished ... and I seal up these records, after I have spoken
a few words by way of exhortation unto you. |
|
Legal Info -
Help
All contents
Copyright © 2000 Ancient America Foundation. All rights
reserved. |